Montessori Education v. Conventional Education

Posted on March 20, 2011 by OWM0615
Montessori Education Conventional Education
Views the child holistically, valuing cognitive, psychological, social, and spiritual development. Views the child in terms of competence, skill level, and achievement with an emphasis on core curricula standards and social development.
Views the child holistically, valuing cognitive, psychological, social, and spiritual development. Views the child in terms of competence, skill level, and achievement with an emphasis on core curricula standards and social development.
Child is an active participant in learning; allowed to move about and respectfully explore the classroom environment; teacher is an instructional facilitator and guide. Child is a more passive participant in learning; teacher has a more dominant, central role in classroom activity.
A carefully prepared learning environment and method encourages development of internal self-discipline and intrinsic motivation. Teacher acts as a primary enforcer of external discipline promoting extrinsic motivation.
Instruction, both individual and group, adapts to students’ learning styles and development levels. Instruction, both individual and group, adapts to core curricula benchmarks.
Three-year classroom age span allows teacher, students, and parents to develop supportive, collaborative and trusting relationships. Same-age and/or skill level grouping; one-year cycles can limit development of strong teacher, student, and parent collaboration.
Grace, courtesy, and conflict resolution are integral part of daily Montessori peace curriculum. Conflict resolution is typically taught separately from daily classroom activity.
Values concentration and depth of experience; supplies uninterrupted time for focused work cycle to develop. Values completion of assignments; time is tightly scheduled.
Child’s learning pace is internally determined. Instructional pace usually set by core-curricula standard expectations, group norm, or teacher.
Child learns to self identify own errors through feedback from the materials; errors are viewed as part of learning process. Work is usually corrected by the teacher; errors are viewed as mistakes.
Learning is reinforced internally through the child’s own repetition of an activity and internal feelings of success. Learning is reinforced externally by test scores and rewards, competition and grades.
Care of self and environment is emphasized as integral to the learning experience. Less emphasis on self-care, spatial awareness, and care of environment.
Child can work where he/she is comfortable.  Children often have the choice between working alone or with a highly collaborative group of students. Child is usually assigned a specific work space; talking among peers discouraged.
Multi-disciplinary, interwoven curriculum. Curriculum areas usually taught as separate topics.
Progress is reported through multiple formats: conferences, narrative reports, checklists and portfolio of student’s work. Progress is usually reported through conferences, report cards/grades, and test scores.
Children are encouraged to teach, collaborate, and help each other. Most teaching is done by the teacher and collaboration is an alternative teaching strategy.
Child is provided opportunities to choose own work from interest and abilities, concepts taught within context of interest. Curricula organized and structured for child based on core curricula standards.
Goal is to foster a love of learning. Goal is to master curricula objectives.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.